Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Books: Caesar: Life Of A Colossus By Adrian Keith Goldsworthy

 



(Drivebycuriosity) - Is the fame of Julius Caesar really justified? Adrian Keith Goldsworthy`s biography "Caesar: Life Of A Colossus" validates the glory ( amazon). Caius Julius Caesar was a polymath; a judge & advocate, law writer, book author (about language), reformer, administrator, senator, reformer, dictator - and - yes - a successful general & warlord.

From the begin of his career Caesar worked on his image. In his youth he got a lot attention because he was the one who dressed distinctively, setting fashions that many younger men copied. He was praised for gestures, the elegance and forcefulness of his stance and bearing, and the tones of his slightly high-pitched voice.  

 

                 Impressing The Crowd 

Caesar started his social rise as a lawyer and was making sure that he was prominent in public life and associated with popular causes. When one of Caesar`s cases came to trial, he (for instance as prosecutor) delivered a speech that greatly impressed onlookers. He subsequently published a version of this speech– a not uncommon practice. We know from ancient commentators that it was widely admired. During a trial Caesar impressed the crowd watching proceedings as well as those taking part, while the publication of the speech helped to build on the reputation he had won. His voice was a little high pitched, but his delivery evidently gave it force and power. 

Caesar`s talents nurtured his career as politician and when he became senator he excelled in the daily business of greeting friends and associates, of doing favors to as many people as possible and so placing them under an obligation without making them feel inferior.

 

            Welding Into Cohesive Force 

Like other Roman aristocrats Caesar sought for success as soldier and later as a general. His military career was based on swift but calculated action, his refusal to be daunted by natural obstacles or initial reverses and the ruthless exploitation of success. He showed a willingness to accept surrender and treat the conquered generously in the hope of turning them into productive, tax-paying members of the province. Caesar developed into an experienced war-leader who welded his warriors into a more cohesive force than his enemies and he acted cautiously.

Caesar wisely cemented his victories. During his campaigns in Gaul allied communities who had remained loyal were given citizenship, as were those who quickly surrendered and, very quickly, those who had been defeated. The readiness with which the Romans extended the franchise to virtually the entire free population of Italy south of the River Po underlined the essential pointlessness of the conflict.

 

                  Extending Roman Rule 

Gaul`s aristocracy earned Roman citizenship and within a century of Caesar’s death the descendants of men who had fought against him would take their place in Rome’s Senate. Gaul`s population, or at least the wealthier classes, were granted the benefits of glass in their windows, running water, sewers, bath-houses and central heating, Gaulish culture was modified and influenced by Roman ideas and concepts to become what is today known as Gallo – Roman culture. Latin became commonly used, especially in the towns and cities and amongst the aristocracy Literacy and the idea of written records spread.

Caesar spent nine years in Gaul, extending Roman rule to the Rhine in the east, the English Channel in the north and the Atlantic coast in the west. The area would remain part of Rome’s empire for the best part of five centuries. During most of that time it would have internal peace-broken by a few rebellions in the first generation or so after conquest, then only by occasional Roman civil wars and, especially in the later years, periodic. 

 

   This Town Is not Big Enough For Both Of US  

Caesar`s steep climb lead to a military conflict with another successful Roman warlord, Pompey, that lead to a Civil War, that began in January 49 BC. The war could not have happened without the bitter, almost obsessive hatred felt towards Caesar by men like Cato, Domitius Ahenobarbus and the others, which made them determined to prevent his return to public life as a consul. Even this would not have mattered if Pompey had not seen an opportunity to demonstrate his supremacy and show these men, as well as Caesar, that they needed to placate him.

In 49 BC Rome´s Republic had become dominated by a faction who ignored the normal rule of law and particularly refused to acknowledge the traditional powers and rights of the tribunate. Yet Caesar was quite open that it was first and foremost because this faction of men had attacked him that he now moved against them. The Roman world was being plunged into chaos and bloodshed because one man was as determined to protect his dignitas as others were to destroy it.   

Caesar´s victories in the campaigns in Gaul and his triumph in the Civil War with Pompey made him immense popular, wealthy & powerful. Goldsworthy writes: "Caesar’s honors were now exceptional. He was made dictator for ten years and all magistrates were formally subordinate to him. To this he added the consulship, for as much of each year as he chose to retain it. Soon this was extended to the formal right to hold the office for ten years. In addition, he controlled the entire Roman army, as well as the Republic’s Treasury".

There is no doubt that by late 45 BC Caesar was effectively a monarch, in the literal sense that he enjoyed far greater power than any other person, group or institution within the Roman Republic. He had gained this position through victory in the Civil War, but his specific powers had been awarded him by the Senate and People. Traditionally a dictator had been limited to a six-month term of office. 

  

                       Et Tu Brutus?

But Caesar`s power and his steep rise created jealousy and envy. The sons of old and more established families, believed that they had more right to lead a lead politician role in Rome´s senate.   

Ultimately, no Roman senator liked to see another man excelling him in glory and influence. It was not so much what Caesar had done that provoked their hostility – most would have happily praised the same deeds,  – especially his victories in Gaul, if only they had been performed by someone else, or better yet by several other men, so that no one individual gained too much glory. Men from established families were raised to believe that they deserved to guide the Republic, but Caesar’s eminence robbed them of much of this role. Finally there was a chance to end his career-preferably in court, and a court that shared their view of the accused and the need to be rid of him, but if not, by armed force.

Eventually they used force. The motives of the conspirators were many and varied, but underlying everything was a sense that to have one man possessing as much permanent power as Caesar was incompatible with a free Republic. 

It is strange that Caesar  had a great fondness  of Brutus, an affection which remained even after the latter had fought against him in 49–48 BC. Anyway, Caesar named him consul for 42 BC. Brutus was also listed amongst the secondary heirs in the dictator’s will.

 

                Cicero And The Assasins 

Cicero, the famous orator, whom Caesar saw as a friend, eventually went to the Capitol and congratulated the assassins, but when Brutus and Cassius went down and spoke from the Rostra in the Forum, the crowd that gathered showed no sign of enthusiasm. Some sources also claim that there was a wax effigy of Caesar showing his injuries. A large crowd had gathered – Cicero later dismissed them as the rabble of the city, but this was no more than conventional abuse of opponents. 

The affection of Rome`s population for Caesar, as a man who throughout his career had consistently advocated measures for the benefit of the wider population and not simply the narrow elite, had never seriously wavered. In 49 BC the vast bulk of the wider population of Italy had not been inclined to take up arms against Caesar. Then and now they had found it much harder than his senatorial opponents to see Caesar as an enemy of the Republic, a term that anyway meant different things to different people. After the funeral came rioting and attacks on the houses of the conspirators and those who had supported them. 

Within three years virtually all of the conspirators had been defeated and were dead, often by their own hands.

Salve Caesar!

 

PS On the top you can see Vincenzo Camuccini`s “Death of Caesar”
 



Sunday, April 26, 2026

Contemporary Art: Roy Lichtenstein - Painting with Scattered Brushstrokes @ Gagosian New York


  (Drivebycuriosity) - Roy Lichtenstein belongs to the pioneers of contemporary & pop art. At Gagosian in Manhattan´s Meatpacking district I recently saw an exhibition with works by the master, called "Painting with Scattered Brushstrokes" (gagosian ). I display here my favorites, a very subjective selection as usual. On top of this post you can see: "Forest scene with temple, 1984".




Above follow "Mirror, 1984" and another painting.  

 

 

Above: "Woman, 1981"

Enjoy! 

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Science Fiction: Shroud By Adrian Tchaikovsky

 




 (Drivebycuriosity) - Adrian Tchaikovsky belongs to the rising stars on the firmament of science fiction and impressed already with novels like “Children of Time” & ”Children of Ruin" and other publications. The author, who has studied studied zoology and psychology, weaves complex & fascinating plots based on logic, biology, evolution & technology and spices his tales with a lot of philosophical musings. 

Tchaikovsky`s latest novel "Shroud" shows what science fiction is capable is of ( amazon). The plot follows 2 humans who try to survive on an alien moon (this is a spoiler free blog). They are confronted with an environment - gravity, atmosphere, radiation, chemistry - which is very different from the conditions on earth. 

"The inner hemisphere of the moon, turned forever towards its planet, was warmed by its radiation. The outer hemisphere, facing eternally away from the planet, received none of it. The imbalance resulted in a constant dog-chasing-tail of a wind system, from warm to cold, and then the cooled atmosphere feeding back to the warm again. A predictable and constant tempest of circulating cells. Something life could evolve to exploit." 

Tchaikovsky describes and explains how intelligent life developed under conditions that are extremely different from life on earth. The result is "a mad world of blind watchmakers (a book title by evolution author Richard Dawkins) where the basic physics of lever and fulcrum had been instinctively mastered in some primordial and thoughtless age". The residents of the moon (the humans are the aliens there) - and how the live & communicated - differ profoundly from life as we know, which causes a lot misunderstanding. But since the locals and the humans are both intelligent, they are adapting and learning from each other.

The author based his tale on sciences, including evolution, physics, chemistry & biology, inspired by the deep bottom of earth´s oceans, where strange life form developed under extremely high pressure, without light and oxygen

But Shroud is also an exciting adventure story where the protagonist have to fight for their survival and to adapt to sheer endless challenges, spiced with dry humor & philosophical musings. "Kirkus Review" compares "Shroud" with classics like Stanislaw Lem´s "Solaris". I agree, but Tchaikowsky`s novel develops also into a nail-biting action thriller. A must read for scifi connoisseurs.

Sunday, April 12, 2026

Economics: Why The Fed Should Ignore Iran War & Oil Price Spike


 (Drivebycuriosity) - The Federal Reserve is postponing the due interest rate cuts, even though the US economy is cooling. Apparently the authority focuses on the  Iran War, the resulting oil price spike and the belief that the war will cause more inflation in the US. I think they are mistaken. Geopolitical events and turbulences on the volatile oil market are not the business of a central bank. 

  “Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon”, declared Milton Friedman. The money volume, the amount of money available in the whole economy, restricts how much people can spend. If they - for in instance - pay higher prices for imported goods, then they purchase fewer of them or they spend less for other goods & services.


                        No More Helicopter Money 

Friedman got forgotten in the recent decades but the recent inflation wave confirms him again. The hot inflation at the begin of this decades was caused by a deluge of money in the years 2020 & 2021. Then the Biden administration flooded the economy with stimulus checks in the value of trillions of dollars to fight the Covid19 recession (American Rescue Plan). The government checks got financed by massive bond purchases by the Federal Reserve (Quantitative Easing, known as QE1,QE2 & QE3).

The government money landed directly on the bank accounts of the Americans, blowing up the money volume M2 (bank notes & coins & short term deposits at banks). Milton Friedman described this as helicopter money (cato.org ). As a result in 2021 & 2022 the US money supply M2, the engine of the inflation, jumped 40%. Unfortunately the money deluge met a constrained supply of goods & services partly - partly because of Covid19. So the price level inevitably had to jump and the inflation rate (first derivation) went up.


                         Causal Relationship

The causal relationship between the money supply and inflation was already recognized by Nicolaus Copernicus! The astronomer explained in the year 1517 why "too much money" causes inflation. Copernicus` "quantity theory of money" is based on observations: Early in the 16th century Spain conquered today`s Latin America and looted the silver stocks. The Spaniards send the precious metal to Europe where it was printed into coins and used as money.

As a result the European money supply jumped, but the supply of goods & services did not change much. The flood of money raised suddenly the demand for scarce goods & services and caused a jump of the price level.

Elaborated studies by Milton Friedman, Karl Brunner, Allan Meltzer and many other economists (known as Monetarists) confirmed Copernicus & the quantity theory of money. They described in the 1960s elaborately how and why the inflation rate follows the growth rate of money with a time lag (causal connection).

 
                   
 Historical Precedent

Today the US inflation is constrained by the slowly growing US money supply. M2 advanced in March just 4.9%.  There is not much range for inflation. Therefore rising prices of oil & oil products create another headwind for the already weakening US economy and might even cause a recession.

There is some historical precedent for oil spikes contributing to a downturn in the economy writes the bilello.blog:

1973-74: Arab Oil embargo led to a spike in Oil prices, and the US economy fell into recession from 1973-75.
 1979-80: Iranian Revolution led to a spike in Oil prices, and the US economy experienced a double-dip recession (1980, 1981-82).
1990-91: Gulf War led to a spike in Oil prices, and the US economy fell into recession (1990-91).
2000: Oil prices spiked near the dot-com bubble peak and the US fell into recession in 2001.
2007-08: Global demand pushed the price of Crude Oil up to a record $147/barrel, and the US economy experienced its worst recession since the Great Depression
. 

The 2007-08 oil price explosion was caused by the notorious Iran sanctions and the fear that Tehran will close the Strait of Hormuz, blocking the oil transports from the Arabian suppliers (I describe it here). And pundits like Goldman Sachs predicted that the price of oil could jump to $200.

Today the US economy is already cooling and stressed by the ongoing trade war and the sharp tariff hikes. In the fourth quarter US economic growth (GDP) already slowed to 0.7%. The weak job market is another signal of distress. Sharply rising oil prices create another headwind. When corporations and households have to spend more money for gasoline & other oil products they have less money for other expenses and need to reduce their purchases of goods & services. In 2008 for instance some households stopped servicing their mortgages and other debts in order to pay for their gasoline bill. 

If the Fed would continue to cut her interest rates soon this step would encourage investing in a difficult time and lighten the stress for the already tattered US economy. 




 

Friday, April 10, 2026

Books: Quantum Mechanics - The Theoretical Minimum By Leonard Susskind & Art Friedman


  (Drivebycuriosity) - Are you familiar with "the dot product defined for ordinary 3-vectors"? If not, the book "Quantum Mechanics: The theoretical minimum" is not for you (amazon ). The authors, Leonard Susskind & Art Friedman, have no do doubt that their readers are. They based their book on their Internet lecture and cater apparently an exclusive circle of theoretical physicists and mathematicians. 

Susskind`s style reminds me of the specific humor of "Sheldon" from the show "The Big Bang Theory". If the reader had worked through page 85 then he is finally "positioned to make some real calculations, something that should make his inner physicist jump for joy". 

 

                 The Person In The Street 

The tandem declares: "To the person in the street, quantum mechanics is all about light being particles and electrons being waves". But up until page 235, the authors have hardly mentioned particles, and the only mention of waves has been the wave function, "which so far has had nothing to do with waves".

According to Google AI Quantum Physics and Quantum Mechanics generally describe the same field—the study of matter and energy at atomic/subatomic scales. "Mechanics" tends to emphasize the mathematical framework, while "physics" is a broader term for the entire discipline including its theories and applications. I read several books about Quantum Physics which where helpful for my understand, "The Theoretical Minimum" is not.  

Thursday, April 9, 2026

Contemporary Art: Iconophilia By Colleen Barry @ Half Gallery New York


 (Drivebycuriosity) - I am fascinated by art, classic and contemporary. But I get the impression that much of the presented art in galleries is mediocre - "just another Rothko .." - what explains that many art sellers are going otu of business. But there are exceptions that keep my love of contemporary art alive. At Half Gallery at Manhattan`s East Village I discovered a fascinated show with works by New York based artist Colleen Barry ( halfgallery).

 


The exhibition is called "Iconophilia". The press release explains: "The Protestant Reformation, the French Revolution, the demise of the Bamiyan Buddhas: all are examples of iconoclasm, the destruction of imagery with political or religious undertones. While Colleen Barry was doing research in this area, she thought to Google the opposite of the term and discovered its iconophilia, the worshiping of pictures".

 



I show her just some of my favorites, a very subjective selection as usual.

 

Enjoy! 

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

Economics: Revisiting Milton Friedman´s Price Theory


 (Drivebycuriosity) - 
Milton Friedman belongs to the most influential economists of the last 100 years. He was the leading monetarist; preaching the classic quantity theory of money and the insight that "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon"But he was much more. Friedman had an enormous influence as a classical liberal and fought for a philosophy of freedom and was an advocate of individual rights, free markets and trade and limited government. Friedman´s economic views are based on his insight that the unregulated movement of prices create the best economic outcome for everyone. A long time ago, when I began to study economics, I read Friedman`s  "Price Theory", based on his lectures at the University of Chicago. This book influenced my thinking till today. Recently I had the pleasure rereading it (amazon ).

Friedman describes how prices respond when producers (the supply) of goods & services want to produce more or less and when consumers, corporations and others (the demand) intend to buy more or less. He also shows how supply & demand respond to price changes, spiced with real-world examples, including the impact of government policies and union actions. 

Friedman`s Price Theory introduced me to the tools of economics. I learned for instance the concept of elasticity that describes how much price changes influence supply & demand. If for instance the demand curve is inelastic every change in quantity supplied will bring about relatively greater changes in price per unit of product. In addition, every increase in quantity supplied means a reduction in total revenue.

I learned how to use indifference and transformation curves, the difference between monopolies and competition and much more.