Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Economics: Monopolies Are A Fairy Tale

 
 (Drivebycuriosity) - Politicians and the media see monopolies behind every corner. The US has 2 huge administrations that try to hunt them down - the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) & the Antitrust Division of the US Department of Justice (DOJ) - and in the European Union the powerful "European Commission" is going against them as well. But do monopolies really exist?

Monopolies tend to vanish, noticed Milton Friedman. Standard Oil was seen as a monopolist and broken up in 1911. But the company`s market dominance was already eroding before its breakup; its share of U.S. refining capacity fell from around 90% in the 1880s to 60-65% by 1911, thanks to new competitors like Texaco and Gulf Oil, expanding regional players, and increased oil production in new areas like the Southwest and California. Its alleged monopoly power was waning as the industry grew and new companies emerged (google).

And who remembers MySpace? The company was once the leading social network and regarded as a monopolist theguardian). But then came Zuckerberg out of nowhere and destroyed MySpace`s "monopoly" by creating Facebook.

 


And what happened with Sony? At the turn of the millennium the Japanese company seemed to rule the world of consumer electronics. They were world market leaders in consumer electronics, driven by burgeoning sales of their Walkman portable players, Trinitron televisions & Handycam camcorders and other products. But early in this century came Steve Jobs and destroyed their markets with Apple products like iPads and iPhones. The stock chart above illustrates the tragical fall of the company ( finance.yahoo.com). 

 


Apple`s iPhone also destroyed the market for plain cellular phones. Nokia, then the world market leader, lost about 90% of her market capitalization  finance.yahoo ).

 

                        Existential Risks 

The fate of MySpace, Sony, Nokia & other alleged monopolies confirms an old wisdom. When a company has success it will inspire others, often copycats, who want a share from the pie. When Jeff Bezos started Amazon in the year 1994 his online bookshop was a monopolist, but just for a very short time. Amazon`s success story inspired worldwide others, the copycats, to offer similar services. Today there are thousands of companies selling online, including giants like Walmart, Target, Best Buy & Costco, who all developed large online departments; and there also exist a lot online platforms like Overstock, Shopify, Wayfair, Etsy & Ebay, who all are successfully copying Amazon.

The existential risks for leading companies are getting even bigger, thanks to AI. October 2020 the Antitrust department of the DOJ sued Google, claiming that the company monopolizes the market for internet search. Late in 2025 Judge Mehta dismissed the monopoly claim. Metha described the search market as “highly competitive” with “numerous new market entrants” in recent years, including the Chinese firm DeepSeek and Elon Musk’s Grok, and wrote that Google is not exactly in pole position to dominate it (techpolicy ). The judge also listed Anthropic, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Perplexity, xAI, and DuckDuckGo as other participants in the market, and noted that they “have access to a lot of capital” to compete. 

The swift rise of AI creates also existential risks for Apple, Micosoft, Metha and other Big Tech. Machine learning allows newcomers to develop and market new and attractive services & products and to challenge the market leaders. 

Monopolies are a fairy tale!


 

 

  

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

Books: Bringing Up The Bodies By Hilary Mantel


 (Drivebycuriosity) - Henry VIII and his six wives are so famous that they almost became a cliché. Hilary Mantel´s  "Wolf Hall" trilogy is set at Henry´s court, but focuses on Thomas Cromwell, the monarchs right hand.

"Bringing up the Bodies" is the second volume ( amazon). While book I focused on the scheming around the rise of Anne Boleyn, who displaced Catherine of Aragon, Henry`s first wive, the 2nd volume focuses on the scheming around her decline, leading to her execution.

As in vol. I Mantel imagines the sheer endless dialogues between Cromwell, Henry, Anne, her family members, the Spanish ambassador (Anne`s adversary) and many other more or less important persons. These conversations are sharp, witty, entertaining and plausible. And I enjoyed Mantel´s atmospheric descriptions of London; Henry´s court and everyday life in England.

I am looking forward to read book III, even though the plot may be sad. 

 PS On top of this post I use an image that does not show instead it depicts the execution of Jane Grey , another queen who got executed in 17th century England, not by Henry but by his daughter Mary. 

Sunday, January 25, 2026

Books: The Wrong Stuff - How The Soviet Space Program Crashed And Burned


 (Drivebycuriosity) - In October 1957 the world got baffled - the Soviets shot a satellite into earth orbit, the Sputnik. This was the first man made object in outer space and suddenly the Soviet Union was ahead of the Americans. The British magazine "The Economist" predicted that the first human to set foot on the Moon “is almost certain to be a Russian.”  

How could the Soviets, devastated by WW II, Stalin`s terror and decades of Marxist mismanagement, suddenly overtake the US? The launch of the Sputnik and following Soviet satellites were the begin of a decades long space race between the world´s superpowers.

John Strausbaugh describes in his book "The Wrong Stuff" how the Soviets did it and how their space program "crashed and burned" ( amazon). The title mirrors Tom Wolfe´s book "The Right Stuff" about the competing American space project.

Yes, the Soviets were still dirt poor, but Stalin`s successor Nikita Khrushchev did not care; he wanted to beat the Americans, what ever this his subjects may cost. The Sputnik - and following Soviet space rockets - gave the new leader of the USSR opportunity after opportunity to troll the Americans about their inferior and tardy space program. It had become a kind of drug to Khrushchev, and he was addicted to it.  

What the USSR lacked in technological knowledge and financial power, it compensated for with brute force and the skill of improvisation, but with a high price. Strausburgh`s book is a record of spectacular and catastrophic launch explosions and other catastrophes. 

 

Corruption, Inefficiency & cynical Laziness

The author reminds the readers of the fact that economic activity was centrally planned in Moscow, and that the central government was overseeing everything from rockets to rolling pins, steel mills to shoes. The immense, multilayered Soviet bureaucracy created to carry out these plans was, like most bureaucracies only more so, a breeding ground for corruption, inefficiency, and cynical laziness. Departments and agencies spread like blight in a field of potatoes, with often overlapping responsibilities, duplicated labor, and waste of limited resources.agencies spread like blight in a field of potatoes, with often overlapping responsibilities, duplicated labor, and waste of limited resources. 

The bureaucrats in charge were “mid- and high-level prima donnas, suspicious and wary as foxes who suspected virtually everyone and trusted almost no one.” 

Compared to the US astronauts the cosmonauts were the real buckaroos. As Soviet citizens, they had grown up poor in a poor land, used to making do in threadbare circumstances. They had survived the cataclysm of the Great Patriotic War, and the horrors of Stalin before and after that. They’d been left standing when millions and millions of fellow citizens’ lives were sacrificed all around them. And they drank vodka like water.

Soviet rockets had to be so big and strong just to get themselves and their payloads off the pad. As an American scientist put it later, they “brute-forced everything. Multiple engines meant more possible glitches and problems.

I learned not only about the space race, Strausbaugh depicts the power fight inside the Soviet leadership and the cold war politics - including the Cuba crises - with a lot of humor and sarcastic. And the "Wrong Stuff" is fun to read.



 



 

 

Saturday, January 17, 2026

Economics: Why Are The Inflation Expectations Way Too High?


  (Drivebycuriosity) - If we believe the University of Michigan, in the next 12 months the US inflation rate will be 4.2%. This is the result of a poll, called "Michigan 1-Year Inflation Expectations" ( sca.isr). The number is way above the current inflation rate of 2.7%.

The expectation doesn`t make sense. While the US economy,  measured by the GDP, advances about 5%, the monetary volume grew just 4.3% (atlantafed   macromicro.). There is not much space for inflation.

Milton Friedman said "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon". The money volume, the amount of money available in the whole economy, restricts how much people can spend. If they - for in instance - pay higher prices for imported goods, then they purchase fewer of them or they spend less for other goods & services.

 

                        Helicopter Money 

Friedman`s claim got confirmed by the recent inflation wave. It was caused by a deluge of money in the years 2020 & 2021. In 2020 & 2021 the Biden government flooded the economy with stimulus checks in the value of trillions of dollars to fight the Covid19 recession (American Rescue Plan). The government checks got financed with massive bond purchases by the Federal Reserve (Quantitative Easing known as QE1,QE2 & QE3).

The government money landed directly on the bank accounts of the Americans, blowing up the money volume M2 (bank notes & coins & deposits at banks). Milton Friedman described this as helicopter money (cato ). As a result in 2021 & 2022 the US money supply M2, the engine of the inflation, jumped 40%. Unfortunately the money deluge met a constrained supply of goods & services partly - partly because of Covid19. So the price level inevitably had to jump and the inflation rate (first derivation) went up.

 


                         Causal Relationship

The causal relationship between the money supply and inflation was already recognized by Nicolaus Copernicus! The astronomer explained in the year 1517 why "too much money" causes inflation. Copernicus` "quantity theory of money" is based on observations: Early in the 16th century Spain conquered today`s Latin America and looted the silver stocks. The Spaniards send the precious metal to Europe where it was printed into coins and used as money.

As a result the European money supply jumped, but the supply of goods & services did not change much. The flood of money raised suddenly the demand for scarce goods & services and caused a jump of the price level.

Elaborated studies by Milton Friedman, Karl Brunner, Allan Meltzer and many other economists (known as Monetarists) confirmed Copernicus & the quantity theory of money. They described in the 1960s elaborately how and why the inflation rate follows the growth rate of money with a time lag (causal connection).


                   Poorly Informed

I assume that the public is as usual poorly informed and misguided by economic illiterate pundits and inadequately educated journalists. The inflation callers focus on the recent tariff hikes, but ignore that rising prices for internationally traded goods & services are just a part of the story and are compensated by falling oil & natural gas prices and do not include the prices for domestic goods & services like dairy products, dentists or the vast leisure industry.

Books: Vile Bodies By Evelyn Waugh


 (Drivebycuriosity) - Evelyn Waugh belongs to the most important English writer of the 20th century and he is loved for his "dark and wicked satire" (libertiesjournal ). I enjoyed the anthology "The Complete Stories Of Evelyn Waugh" (my review ) and liked the TV-adaption of his novel "Brideshead Revisited".

Unfortunately his novel "Vile Bodies" does not work for me (amazon). The satirical novel, set in the 1930s, follows a decadent and hedonistic group of wealthy young London socialites. There is no plot - just some random episodes - and I did not care about the characters, whom I find unbelievable. There are some funny ideas but they do not compensate for the general weakness. Waugh could do better.

 

Monday, December 29, 2025

Books: How The Chicago School Of Economics Influenced Science, Politics & Economy


 (Drivebycuriosity) - Scarcity belongs to the greatest problems of live. We are short of many things: money, capital, time, space, medicine, hospitals, computer chips, etc. Economics is the science of how to overcome scarcity; economists focus on efficiency, rationality & cost-benefit considerations. The most rigorous economists could be find at the 
University of Chicago, known as Chicago School of Economics, the most famous of them is Milton Friedman. 

Johan van Overtveldt`s describes in "The Chicago School: How the University of Chicago Assembled the Thinkers Who Revolutionized Economics and Business" how Chicago`s economists influenced science, politics & economy ( amazon).

 

        Advocates For Limited Government 

What makes "Chicago" special? Contrary to the followers of John Maynard Keynes, the Keynesians, Chicago economists strongly believe in the power of markets and they advocate for a limited government. They use the tool of economic theory to explain many aspects of live and they claim that the market system possesses inherently more power diffusion than any alternative system. Milton Friedman, the most famous Chicago economist, declared: "Chicago" stands for  belief in the efficacy of the free market as a means of organizing scarce resources. Robert Mundell, who was Professor of Economics and Editor of the Journal of Political Economy at the University of Chicago, describes the credo of Chicago economists: They apply economics for every nook and cranny of human experience. 

Milton Friedman and other "Chicagoans" popularized the Chicago price theory - the analysis of rational human choice under conditions of scarcity. Friedman & Co. taught that human behavior is shaped by price signals, because people want more of what was cheap and less of what of what was dear, or would prefer (by same risk, stress, time etc) a higher income to a lower one. Therefore the price system - the free interaction of buyers and sellers - could produce better social outcomes than the decisions of politicians and regulators.

Chicago largely shaped the economics of regulation and deregulation and criticized government interventions in economic processes. Chicago economist George Stigler noticed that the regulatory process is dominated by specific interest groups—“the industry,” who try to use it to their own advantage. Stigler`s "capture theory" is diametrically opposed to the traditional view that regulation is primarily instituted by a benevolent political authority in order to protect the public.

 

                 Vanishing Monopolies 

Consequentially "Chicago" influenced the discussion about antitrust and monopolies and defended huge corporations against the claim that "big is bad". Chicago economist Yale Brozen explained: If firms grow very big, it must be because of superior management, economies of scale (average costs fall when a firm gets bigger), or the production of better products that satisfy a major portion of buyers at a lower cost to them. Any attempt at monopolistic or collusive behavior requires restriction of output and sacrifice of market share. If those companies tried to exert market power and raise their prices substantially, others would enter the market. And Chicago economist Richard Posner observed: Too often antitrust suits were brought by or on behalf of inefficient competitors against their deservedly more successful rivals. 

Milton Friedman claimed that - government intervention aside - monopolies tend to vanish and competition to revive. He also criticized the idea that companies are responsible for social issues, today known as DEI (Diversity, Equity & Inclusion): "There is one and only one responsibility of business - to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits as long as it stays within the rules of the game. A corporate executive only had direct responsibility to his employers. To divert resources to other goals would be unethical, spending someone else´s money for a great social interest".

Chicago`s skepticism about the role of the government included taxation. Chicago economist Arthur Laffer explained the consequences of tax hikes with a simple chart. His famous Laffer Curve showed that tax receipts would first increase as the rate of taxation is pushed up. At a certain point, however, the disincentive effects of taxation become dominant, so as the rate of taxation continues to rise, tax receipts actually start to fall.

 

                               New Areas  

Chicago economists expanded economics to new areas. Gary Becker, a student of Milton Friedman, epitomized the Chicago School economics philosophy by applying core economic tools—like cost-benefit analysis and rational choice—to a vast range of human behaviors previously considered outside economics, such as discrimination, the allocation of time within a family, using the economic approach to explain the decisions to have children and to educate them, and the decisions to marry and to divorce and more ( econlib).  

Becker focused on decisions of households, how you and I respond to economic incentives. Becker's Nobel Prize lecture (1992) is entitled "The Economic Way Of Looking At Life". Becker belonged to the pioneers of human capital theory and pointed out - what again seems like common sense but was new at the time -: Education is an investment. Education adds to our human capital just as other investments add to physical capital" (econlib ). 

According to Becker households are producers as well as consumers; they produce commodities by combining inputs of goods and time according to the cost-minimization minimization rules of the traditional theory of the firm. In his book "Human Capital" Becker declared that the decision to invest in human capital (e.g., education, training, and health) can be analyzed in the same way as any other investment. People investment in their human capital when the benefits outweigh the costs.

 

                  Does Crime Pay? 

According to Becker crime only happens because it “does pay.” Criminals respond to incentives as professors and others in choosing their occupations. Potential criminals consider the cost as well as benefits from crime in deciding whether to become criminals. Becker assumed that a better education (investment in human capital) reduces crime by raising earnings from legal activities. Otherwise a greater likelihood of apprehending and punishing criminals also reduces crime by raising the cost to potential criminals of engaging in crime. 

Becker inspired his students to explore religious sects - for instance signaling one`s devotion to the deity - or looked at cheating among Sumo wrestlers. Chicago influenced economists to study non-traditional topics, such as suicide, addiction, riots, warfare, charity and more.

Margaret Reid, another Chicagoan, wrote a dissertation about "The Economics of Household Production". She defined household production as unpaid activities performed by and for the members of the household. To estimate in dollar terms the market value of household production, Reid guessed the opportunity cost, the earnings foregone because of household production.

 

          Chasing Too Few Goods  

Milton Friedman became famous for his work about the role of money and popularized the quantity theory of money. Together with Anna Schwartz he wrote the monumental study "A Monetary History of the United States". Friedman/Schwartz blamed the 1930s depression mainly on the Federal Reserve because the authority allowed a  roughly one-third reduction in the stock of money that was the key element explaining the severity of the Great Depression of the 1930s. 

Merton Miller, who was on the faculty of the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business from 1961 until his retirement in 1993, agreed: "The central banks of the world, have the power, though not always the will or the wisdom, to stop in its tracks any downward cascading financial spiral. Our own Federal Reserve System failed miserably on that count in the early 1930s, but at least learned some important lessons in the process that have made the prospect of a recurrence of the 1930s for the U.S. virtually unthinkable".

Friedman famously claimed that "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon", based on the quantity theory of money. He declared "too many dollars chasing too few goods cause a general rise of prices". The recent inflation wave, caused by a deluge of money generated by government checks & massive bond purchases by the Federal Reserve, Friedman´s helicopter money, confirms him again.

Friedman dismissed the counter-cyclical policy, advocated by the Keynesians, where the central bank reduces interest rates to stimulate the economy in a recession and hikes interest rates to fight inflation and an over-heating economy. He justified his critique with the evidence the central bank measures often overshoot, partly because the economy responds with unpredictable time lags. Instead he postulated a monetary growth rule where the central bank attempts a relatively stable growth rate of the money volume. 

Chicagoan Robert Lucas refined Friedman`s thesis. He stated that anticipated changes in money growth have very different effects from unanticipated changes. Anticipated monetary expansions raise inflation, but they do not stimulate employment and production because workers demand higher wages. Unanticipated monetary expansions, on the other hand, can stimulate production as, symmetrically, unanticipated contractions can induce depression, because they can trick workers and investors. 

 

                      Pariah Of The Left 

In their heydays Chicago economists, above all Milton Friedman, influenced the politics in the West and laid the intellectual roots of the Reagan and Thatcher revolutions of the 1980. Friedman also argued for "strengthening of free-market economies in the less-developed nations, the removal of obstacles to private international trade, and the fostering of a climate favorable to private international investment".  

Unfortunately Friedman and other Chicago economists - the so-called Chicago Boys - became a pariah of the left after they visited Chile, where they advised the government and convinced dictator Pinochet to set on market forces instead of government controls and taught the Chilean administration how to reduce Chile`s red-hot inflation by slowing the growth of money. 

Gary Becker may have put the Chicago spirit best. He said in the banquet speech for his Nobel Prize: "Economics surely does not provide a romantic vision of life. But the widespread poverty, misery, and crisis in many parts of the world, much of it unnecessary, are strong reminders that understanding economic and social laws can make an enormous contribution to the welfare of people".  




Wednesday, December 24, 2025

Books: Vanilla: Travels in Search of the Ice Cream Orchid


 (Drivebycuriosity) - Vanilla seems to be a very simple and boring product, as the slogan "plain vanilla" claims. But I learned from Tim Escott`s book "Vanilla: Travels in Search for the Ice Cream Orchid", that the world of vanilla is anything but boring (amazon ). 
Escott traveled to Mexico, Tahiti, Madagaskar, Mahé/Seychelles & Réunion, visited plantations, libraries, a historical greenhouse in London and spoke with farmers, historians, traders, speculators and food producers. He dives deep into the history, biology, chemistry and economics of Vanilla, we read about Thomas Jefferson`s cravings and learn about the politics and violence that were sometimes connected with it.

Some tidbits: 

The vanilla plants are the only orchids - from over 25,000 species - which produces an agriculturally valuable crop. There are more than a hundred different species of vanilla orchids, and they grow all over the tropics with the exception of Australia. All of the vanilla orchids produce fruits containing seeds, fruits containing seeds, but only a few species bear the large aromatic pods which can be used commercially. Virtually all of the cultivated vanilla in the world today comes from just one species,  Vanilla panifolia (sometimes called Vanilla fragrans), a plant indigenous to Central America  and particularly the south-eastern part of Mexico.

Vanilla likes moist heat, a hilly well drained site and just the right amount of sunshine and shade. The orchids cannot tolerate temperatures lower than about 6°C, and prefer the temperature range between 21°-32°C. They also need as much as three thousand millimeters of rain, fairly evenly distributed throughout the seasons.

Drying, curing and conditioning the pods is an art, which if done properly takes another nine months. Escott describes in many chapters why vanilla is the most labor intensive agricultural product in the world.

 

                       Surgery And Sex   

Even the pollination is a very delicate and complicated process. Escott writes: "Orchids have a reputation for lewd sexual display. Their intricate and erotic petals and lips are often unavoidably reminiscent of human female pudenda. But, alluring as they may appear to the human eye, they guard their own sexual parts away from view. While ‘ordinary’ flowers will happily display their breeding organs at the heart of their open petals, the orchid is generally more discreet. One of the special features of orchids is that the sexual parts of the flower are fused into a single structure known as the column ...."

Apparently the very specific conditions for natural pollination exist only in the central American home regions. Vanilla planters elsewhere cannot rely on natural pollinators to fertilize their orchids. They must do the job themselves. The author tried it himself: "The whole process felt like a mixture of minor surgery and sex".

 

                Monopolies Are A Fairy Tale 

In the past a dictator of Madagascar, the leading producer of vanilla, created a stabilization fund to control the Vanilla business by buying the product when prices fall and selling when prices rise, but without success. One producer said: "What the people don’t seem to understand is that monopolies are a fairy tale. They only exist under dictatorships where they can be enforced. Anyone who’s ever tried to farm vanilla on a large scale knows what a headache it is. The security you need to protect thousands of acres of plantation is a nightmare, and actually makes it uneconomic. And anyway—even if we dominated the market—we are still going to have to obey the laws of supply and demand. Maybe we could slow a price crash down a little bit because of the volumes we trade in—but when the market falls, it falls.”

Today the Vanilla market is influenced by speculators who are betting on rising or falling prices. Some are spying to get early information or are bringing rumors into circulation.

The book is highly recommended, I did not only learn much about the tasty product, Escott delivers a lot history and reports about the culture & cuisine of the vanilla growing regions and the functioning of a very special market.