(Drivebycuriosity) - There is still a lot talk about the 2008 Financial Crisis. And many doomsters are predicting a comeback of the crisis or even worse. But since 2008 just one recession happened, which was very short and mild. History shows that everything got better over time (live expectancy, GDP per capita, working hours etc).
Even crisis have been getting less worse over time. Yes the 2008 recession was bad, but the depression of the 1930 was much worse. It lasted from 1929 till 1939 and GDP in the US shrank 30%.
And the crises in the 19th century were even worse than the 1930 depression. The historian John Steele Gordon describes in his economic history of America ("An Empire Of Wealth - Rise Of The American Economy" amazon) the frequent and severe crises of the 19th century. They were started by recurrent crashes of banks, railroads and other companies which caused a panic leading to a depression:
"Sellers panic produce, by their nature, a sudden surge in demand
for money as investors and depositors seek liquidity, and money, of
course, is the ultimate liquid asset. Because there was no central bank
empowered to regulate the money supply and to provide the liquidity
needed to protect the banking system in times of stress, however, these
sellers`panics greatly exacerbated the downward swings of the business
cycle. Basically sound institutions collapsed by the hundreds when they
were unable to meet the sudden demand for money. Often they took the
life savings of families and the liquid assets of businesses with them".
One of these frequent depressions began in early 1893: "By the end of
the year some Fifteen Thousand
companies had failed, along with 491 banks. The gross national product
fell by 12%, and unemployment rose rapidly from a mere 3% in 1892 to
18.4% two years later", reports Gordon. The recession 2008, as bad as it
was, was not comparable with this event or the 1930s depression.
The observation that crises got worse the farther you go into the past implies reversely that crises are getting less severe the later in history they occur.
The 19th century crises were less apocalyptic then Europe`s Great Famine from 1315 through 1317. About 5-12% of the population of northern Europe died from starvation or related disease (smith.edu/ ). In the 15th century struck in Europe the Great Bullion Famine, caused by a shortage of precious metals that were used as money. The Great Depression, as bad as it was, was not as catastrophic as the 1893 crisis. And the 2008 recession was by far not as disastrous as the Great Depression of the 1930s and the crisis of the 19th century.
Rookie Mistakes
I think this is a result of a general learning process. People are able
to learn from their mistakes and they try to get better, that includes
politicians, public institutions, banks and other corporations. In 1913
the US government finally had learned from the 19th century crisis and
created the Federal
Reserve System, the central bank. This institution was founded to
stabilize the money supply and to supply liquidity in a bank panic. But
the Fed was young, inexperienced and made rookie mistakes.
In the year 1931 the Federal Reserve moved aggressively to defend the
dollar and maintain the gold standard as foreign banks and investors
moved to repatriate gold, writes Gordon: "It was an utterly disastrous decision,
perhaps the greatest of all mistakes made in these years. Maintaining the gold standard required raising interest rates
and cutting the money supply, causing an already severe deflation to
become much more severe." Banks called loans to stay liquid, while
customers postponed purchases in expectation of lower prices.
Milton Friedman and his colleague Anna Schwartz described in their book
"A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960" , that The Great
Depression could have been avoided if the Fed had not so badly botched
its monetary policy (fee.org):
"Fed’s failure to carry out its assigned role as the lender of last
resort. Rather than providing liquidity through loans, the Fed just
watched as banks dropped like flies, seemingly oblivious to the effect
this would have on the money supply. The Fed could have offset the
decrease created by bank failures by engaging in bond purchases, but it
did not".
As a result "from 1929 to 1933 the money supply fell by 27 percent—for every $3 in circulation in
1929 (whether in currency or deposits), only $2 was left in 1933. Such a
drastic fall in the money supply inevitably led to a massive decrease
in aggregate demand. People’s savings were wiped out so their natural
response was to save more to compensate, leading to plummeting
consumption spending" (fee.org).
And the US government made more fatal mistakes too (fee.org):
1) In response to a sharp decrease in tax revenues in 1930 and 1931
(caused by a slowdown of economic activities), the US government passed
the largest peacetime tax increase in the history of the United States, which clearly applied the brakes on any recovery that could have taken place;
2) the US government also passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in
1930, substantially increasing tariffs and leading to retaliatory
restrictions by trading partners, which resulted in a considerable
decrease in demand for U.S. exports and a further slowdown in production
(not to mention a loss of mutually advantageous division of labor).
Learning Process
The time since World War II shows that the Fed and other institutions
had learned from the Great Depression, at least a bit. For instance the stock market
crash from 1987 (Black Monday) - a drop of 22% over night - didn´t start
a recession, because the Fed responded swiftly and "encouraged banks to
continue to lend to one another on their usual terms" (federalreserve).
The US economy grew 3.6% in 1987 and advanced 4.2% in 1988 in spite of
the stock market turmoils.
The 2008 crisis didn´t turn into a fully fledged depression in the 1930s style thanks to the Federal Reserve and other central banks who cut interest rates close to zero and flooded the markets with money (QE), even later than they should have.
I believe
that the next downturn will be less severe than the recession of 2008
because the Fed and other central banks have already learned from the
2008 crises. They have been refining and advancing their instruments
(like negative interest rates, assets purchases) further and are better
suited to response to a banking crises.
The regulators are learning too. New laws (in the US the Dodd-Frank Act wikipedia) require the banks to hold more capital to collateralize their loans and they have to pass stress tests.
No wonder, that the so-called Corona Recession in the US, caused by lock downs, infections & public distancing, lasted just from February 2020 through April 2020.
Recessions are possible, they belong to
a business cycle, but they will be mild and depressions are highly unlikely. Everything is
getting better over time - even the crises.
